{"id":8240,"date":"2026-10-14T20:35:44","date_gmt":"2026-10-14T18:35:44","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blueportance.com\/knowledge-base\/expert-guides\/living-flows\/adaptability-potential-sitting\/foundational-principles\/"},"modified":"2026-10-25T22:44:11","modified_gmt":"2026-10-25T21:44:11","slug":"foundational-principles","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/blueportance.com\/en\/knowledge-base\/expert-guides\/living-flows\/adaptability-potential-sitting\/foundational-principles\/","title":{"rendered":"KB 3_Expert Guide_02_Living Flows_03_Adaptability Potential_02_Four Foundational Principles"},"content":{"rendered":"\n\n<!-- KB 3 \u00b7 SBNFA expert dossier (US) \u00b7 02-foundational-principles.html \u00b7 source iCloud Dossier expert SBNFA US (5\/10\/2026) -->\n<nav aria-label=\"Dossier chapters\" class=\"bp-dossier-nav\"><a href=\"https:\/\/blueportance.com\/en\/knowledge-base\/expert-guides\/living-flows\/adaptability-potential-sitting\/\">Pillar<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/blueportance.com\/en\/knowledge-base\/expert-guides\/living-flows\/adaptability-potential-sitting\/living-system\/\">1 \u00b7 From Fixed Mechanism to Living System<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/blueportance.com\/en\/knowledge-base\/expert-guides\/living-flows\/adaptability-potential-sitting\/foundational-principles\/\">2 \u00b7 Four Foundational Principles<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/blueportance.com\/en\/knowledge-base\/expert-guides\/living-flows\/adaptability-potential-sitting\/functional-evaluation-grid\/\">3 \u00b7 Seven Functions, Nineteen Variables<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/blueportance.com\/en\/knowledge-base\/expert-guides\/living-flows\/adaptability-potential-sitting\/dynamic-chair-benchmark\/\">4 \u00b7 Product Benchmark: A Dated Application of the Framework<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/blueportance.com\/en\/knowledge-base\/expert-guides\/living-flows\/adaptability-potential-sitting\/measurement-validation\/\">5 \u00b7 From Expert Evaluation to Instrumented Measurement<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/blueportance.com\/en\/knowledge-base\/expert-guides\/living-flows\/adaptability-potential-sitting\/glossary-bibliography\/\">6 \u00b7 Appendices, Glossary, and Bibliography<\/a><\/nav>\n<article class=\"bp-satellite\">\n<header>\n<p class=\"bp-meta\">SBNFA\u2122 Dossier \u00b7 Version 1.1 of <time datetime=\"2026-10-05\">October 5, 2026<\/time><br\/>Gil Ayache, PhD \u2014 Mines Paris \u2013 PSL \u00b7 Cofounder and President of Blue Portance<\/p>\n<h1>Four Foundational Principles<\/h1>\n<\/header><aside aria-label=\"Claim statuses\" class=\"bp-status\"><h2>Reading the statuses<\/h2><p>The labels <strong>[ESTABLISHED]<\/strong>, <strong>[MECHANICAL]<\/strong>, <strong>[SBNFA PROPOSITION]<\/strong> and <strong>[OUTLOOK]<\/strong> indicate the nature of each claim. They are defined on the <a href=\"https:\/\/blueportance.com\/en\/knowledge-base\/expert-guides\/living-flows\/adaptability-potential-sitting\/#statuts\">dossier home page<\/a>.<\/p><\/aside>\n<section class=\"bp-summary\">\n<p class=\"bp-answer\"><strong>In brief.<\/strong> What is the biomechanical evaluation of seating based on? On four principles observed in natural positions: motor variability, tissue flows, segmental independence and autonomous regulation of balance. Good seating preserves adaptability potential: the full range of postural and tissue adjustments that remain accessible to the seated person.<\/p>\n<p>This second chapter of the expert dossier presents the four foundational principles of the SBNFA\u2122 framework \u2014 motor variability, tissue flows, segmental independence, autonomous regulation \u2014 setting out, for each one, the literature drawn upon, what it establishes, and the limits of its transposition to seating.<\/p>\n<p>It defines adaptability potential in the seated position, distinguishes it from adaptability (postural and tissue) and from the postural adaptive reserve, presents the sensory and proprioceptive loop, and shows how the principles translate into seven functions, through a system of evidence-status labels.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n<nav aria-label=\"Contents\" class=\"bp-toc\"><h2>Contents<\/h2><ol><li><a href=\"#introduction\">Introduction<\/a><\/li><li><a href=\"#section-1\">1. Natural positions: a starting point, not proof<\/a><\/li><li><a href=\"#section-2\">2. Principle 1 \u2014 Motor variability<\/a><\/li><li><a href=\"#section-3\">3. Principle 2 \u2014 Tissue flows<\/a><\/li><li><a href=\"#section-4\">4. Principle 3 \u2014 Segmental independence<\/a><\/li><li><a href=\"#section-5\">5. Principle 4 \u2014 Autonomous regulation<\/a><\/li><li><a href=\"#section-6\">6. Adaptability potential in the seated position<\/a><\/li><li><a href=\"#section-7\">7. From principles to functions<\/a><\/li><li><a href=\"#section-8\">8. What the literature establishes, what the framework draws from it<\/a><\/li><li><a href=\"#faq\">Frequently asked questions<\/a><\/li><li><a href=\"#references\">References<\/a><\/li><\/ol><\/nav>\n<section class=\"bp-section\" id=\"introduction\">\n<h2>Introduction<\/h2>\n<p class=\"bp-lead\">Every evaluation grid rests on principles that are not themselves evaluated. The SBNFA\u2122 framework has four: motor variability, tissue flows, segmental independence, and autonomous regulation. This chapter presents them as <strong>foundational principles [SBNFA PROPOSITION]<\/strong>: a functional reading of documented phenomena, whose transposition to seating must be discussed and tested.<\/p>\n<p>These principles do not replace the grid. They guide its SBNFA construction: each of the seven functions and nineteen variables presented in <a href=\"https:\/\/blueportance.com\/en\/knowledge-base\/expert-guides\/living-flows\/adaptability-potential-sitting\/functional-evaluation-grid\/\">Chapter 3 (dynamic seating evaluation grid)<\/a> is tied to one of them, or to the specific constraint of prolonged compression. Their formulation evolves with the literature; their role is to explain <em>why<\/em> a capacity is evaluated, before stating <em>how<\/em> it is rated.<\/p>\n<p>For each principle, this chapter identifies the literature drawn upon, what it establishes in its study context, and what the framework draws from it for seating [<a href=\"#ref-1\">1<\/a>].<\/p>\n<\/section>\n<section class=\"bp-section\" id=\"section-1\">\n<h2>1. Natural positions: a starting point, not proof<\/h2>\n<p class=\"bp-lead\">The framework takes as its starting point the comparison between the seated position and <strong>natural positions<\/strong>: standing, squatting, kneeling, cross-legged, in motion. These are configurations in which the body retains a capacity for adjustment, load redistribution, and active regulation.<\/p><figure class=\"bp-figure\" id=\"figure-wp-03\"><a href=\"https:\/\/blueportance.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/03-natural-positions-ENUS.png\"><img decoding=\"async\" alt=\"Natural positions\" loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/blueportance.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/03-natural-positions-ENUS.png\" style=\"width:100%;height:auto\"\/><\/a><figcaption>Illustration 2 \u2014 Natural positions. [SBNFA PROPOSITION] Natural positions: variability of support, active regulation of postural balance, segmental independence and mobility. <a href=\"https:\/\/blueportance.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/03-natural-positions-ENUS.png\">Open in full resolution<\/a><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>A natural position is not a stable geometric shape. It relies on continuous adjustments, relative freedom of the segments, and a distribution of stresses that is not concentrated on a single point of support. It is this definition \u2014 functional rather than geometric \u2014 that serves as the consistency check for the entire benchmark.<\/p>\n<p>The study by Raichlen and colleagues (PNAS, 2020) on the Hadza of Tanzania illustrates the difference between rest and immobility: adults spend a notable share of their non-ambulatory rest time squatting, a posture in which muscle activity remains higher than that observed on a chair [<a href=\"#ref-2\">2<\/a>]. <strong>[ESTABLISHED]<\/strong> This observation describes resting postures in a given population. It does not establish that a seat should reproduce squatting.<\/p>\n<p>Bernstein, for his part, showed more broadly that postural coordination relies on the dynamic management of the body\u2019s degrees of freedom rather than on locking them [<a href=\"#ref-3\">3<\/a>].<\/p>\n<div class=\"bp-key-message\">\n<p>A founding principle of the framework: an analogy with natural positions is not proof. It serves to identify the functions to be investigated; each mechanism and each expected effect must then be documented according to its own level of evidence.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<section class=\"bp-section\" id=\"section-2\">\n<h2>2. Principle 1 \u2014 Motor variability<\/h2>\n<p class=\"bp-lead\">Living systems do not function through prolonged immobility, but through adjustments, micro-corrections, and changes in postural strategy. Transposed to seating, this first principle means that a device should not impose a fixed geometry, but should allow discreet movement of the pelvis, trunk, and limbs without demanding excessive control effort.<\/p>\n<p>Stergiou and colleagues (Journal of Neurologic Physical Therapy, 2006) proposed viewing movement variability not as noise to be eliminated, but as a characteristic of healthy systems, operating within an optimal range: too little variability, like too much disorder, would be associated with reduced adaptive capacity [<a href=\"#ref-4\">4<\/a>, <a href=\"#ref-5\">5<\/a>]. <strong>[ESTABLISHED]<\/strong> This theoretical framework is discussed in the human movement literature, mainly for gait and motor control.<\/p>\n<p><strong>[SBNFA PROPOSITION]<\/strong> Its transposition to seating leads to four requirements: maintaining sufficient degrees of freedom, allowing spontaneous micromovements, enabling postural readjustment without loss of stability, and diversifying support over time.<\/p>\n<p>This principle informs Function 1 (Preservation of Adaptability Potential) and Function 2 (Management of Compensations). The decisive point is the <strong>governance of movement<\/strong>: who initiates it, who chooses its direction, amplitude, speed, and stopping point? Pynt (Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies, 2015) proposes defining dynamic seating as an action supplied by the seated person and accompanied by the seat\u2019s mechanism [<a href=\"#ref-6\">6<\/a>]. This definition underpins the distinction, central to the framework, between movement led by the subject and movement produced or directed by the seat.<\/p>\n<p>In the grid, this definition grounds the distinction between ADP-1 (subject-led control of change) and ADP-2 (mechanical resolution of the interface).<\/p>\n<\/section>\n<section class=\"bp-section\" id=\"section-3\">\n<h2>3. Principle 2 \u2014 Tissue flows<\/h2>\n<p class=\"bp-lead\">Living tissues need circulation, oxygenation, mechanical stimulation, and alternation between compression and decompression. Continuous pressure on the support areas \u2014 ischial tuberosities, coccyx, thighs, pelvic floor \u2014 slows these flows and can cause local overload.<\/p>\n<p>This principle translates into offloading sensitive structures, distributing pressure, reducing peak loads, and functionally alternating load-bearing areas. The quality of a seat therefore depends on how it distributes load in space, but also over time. Criteria for the ergonomic evaluation of work chairs have long incorporated the distribution of support [<a href=\"#ref-7\">7<\/a>].<\/p>\n<p>Two sources document the biological basis. Landis measured capillary pressure in human skin by micro-injection as early as 1930 [<a href=\"#ref-8\">8<\/a>]: this is the historical foundation for studying the effects of prolonged compression on tissue perfusion. Lengsfeld and colleagues (Clinical Biomechanics, 2000) examined variations in spinal load during rotatory dynamic sitting [<a href=\"#ref-9\">9<\/a>]; this is an exploratory study of a single subject. Finally, Langevin and colleagues (BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 2011) reported reduced thoracolumbar fascial gliding in people with chronic low back pain [<a href=\"#ref-10\">10<\/a>], a correlational study.<\/p>\n<p><strong>[ESTABLISHED]<\/strong> These studies establish that compression, perfusion, and tissue gliding are relevant parameters for load tolerance. <strong>[SBNFA PROPOSITION]<\/strong> The framework draws from them the requirement to distribute pressure in space and over time. It derives no ischemia threshold from them: no universal threshold can be derived from a multi-criteria analysis, and any claim about a user\u2019s perfusion or tissue health falls within the scope of specific biological studies.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n<section class=\"bp-section\" id=\"section-4\">\n<h2>4. Principle 3 \u2014 Segmental independence<\/h2>\n<p class=\"bp-lead\">The human body is a kinematic chain, not a monolithic block. The pelvis, hips, trunk, and spine must be able to cooperate without being mechanically fused by the seat. This is the subject of the third principle, segmental independence.<\/p>\n<p>Hasegawa and Dubousset (Spine Surgery and Related Research, 2022) describe a \u201cchain of balance\u201d linking the lower limbs, the pelvis \u2014 regarded as a \u201cpelvic vertebra\u201d \u2014, the spine, and the head [<a href=\"#ref-11\">11<\/a>]. Barrey and colleagues (European Spine Journal, 2013), for their part, analyze the compensatory mechanisms by which the pelvis and spine maintain sagittal balance [<a href=\"#ref-12\">12<\/a>]. Vleeming and colleagues (Journal of Anatomy, 2012) synthesize the anatomy and function of the sacroiliac joint [<a href=\"#ref-13\">13<\/a>].<\/p>\n<p><strong>[ESTABLISHED]<\/strong> For standing posture and spinal surgery, these studies describe the pelvis as the central relay of the compensation chain; they also describe the sacroiliac joint as a low-amplitude joint with an important functional role in load transfer. <strong>[SBNFA PROPOSITION]<\/strong> By functional transposition, the framework concludes that an interface should allow cooperation between segments to express itself rather than fixing the pelvis as an inert base.<\/p>\n<p>A point of principle: pelvic incidence is a morphological parameter of the subject. Seating can modify the functional orientation of the pelvis, not the anatomical incidence. This is why the 90\u00b0 pelvis\u2013femur relationship is not adopted as a norm: it is a functional hypothesis, to be individualized.<\/p>\n<p>This principle informs Function 3 (pelvic mobility in all three planes) and sheds light on Functions 2 and 7, where segmental independence translates into observables: spine\u2013pelvis pivoting, independent accommodation of load-bearing regions.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n<section class=\"bp-section\" id=\"section-5\">\n<h2>5. Principle 4 \u2014 Autonomous regulation<\/h2><p><strong>[SBNFA PROPOSITION]<\/strong> \u201cAutonomous\u201d refers here to the subject\u2019s postural regulation, with no trajectory imposed by the support. The term does not demonstrate activation of the autonomic nervous system, nor a subcortical benefit induced by the seat.<\/p><figure class=\"bp-figure\" id=\"figure-wp-04\"><a href=\"https:\/\/blueportance.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/R-postural-regulation-ENUS.png\"><img decoding=\"async\" alt=\"Postural regulation: a dynamic balance in the service of adaptability\" loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/blueportance.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/R-postural-regulation-ENUS.png\" style=\"width:100%;height:auto\"\/><\/a><figcaption>Illustration 3 \u2014 Postural regulation: a dynamic balance in the service of adaptability. [SBNFA PROPOSITION] Active regulation of postural balance: sensory information, segmental adjustments, and balance space. <a href=\"https:\/\/blueportance.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/R-postural-regulation-ENUS.png\">Open in full resolution<\/a><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"bp-lead\">The body constantly adjusts its posture based on sensory feedback. A seat should therefore offer a zone of dynamic stability: enough support to prevent postural collapse, enough freedom to allow the nervous system to correct and reorganize posture without overload.<\/p>\n<p>Peterka (Journal of Neurophysiology, 2002) proposed a sensorimotor integration model of postural control [<a href=\"#ref-14\">14<\/a>], complemented by the posture control model of Mergner, Maurer, and Peterka [<a href=\"#ref-15\">15<\/a>]. Boonstra, Schouten, and van der Kooij (Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 2013) identified the differentiated contribution of the ankle and hip joints to multi-segmental balance control [<a href=\"#ref-16\">16<\/a>]. Horak (Age and Ageing, 2006) distinguishes, within postural control, postural orientation from balance proper [<a href=\"#ref-17\">17<\/a>].<\/p>\n<p><strong>[ESTABLISHED]<\/strong> These models describe balance control while standing or under perturbation. <strong>[SBNFA PROPOSITION]<\/strong> The framework draws from them a requirement for seating: that the left and right hip\u2013ankle chains can act independently, that the subject has a perimeter within which to move, stop, stabilize, and move again, and that the reference position is adjustable.<\/p>\n<p>This principle informs Function 4 (Regulation of Postural Balance) and Function 6 (Processing and Feedback of Mechanical Information). On this second point, the framework is explicit: <strong>proprioception is not \u201cproduced\u201d by the seat.<\/strong> The functional question is how the seat processes the mechanical information the body gives it \u2014 blocking it, absorbing it, processing it globally, or responding to it locally, in a differentiated and proportionate way. The subject remains the initiator of change.<\/p>\n<div class=\"bp-highlight\">\n<p>Principle of wording: a seat neither \u201cstimulates\u201d nor \u201ccontrols\u201d a user\u2019s proprioception. It may, or may not, let the user\u2019s sensorimotor loop function without blocking it or substituting for it.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<section class=\"bp-section\" id=\"section-6\">\n<h2>6. Adaptability potential in the seated position<\/h2>\n<p class=\"bp-lead\">The four principles converge on a notion that Blue Portance places at the center of its approach: <strong>adaptability potential in the seated position<\/strong>. Three related terms must be distinguished.<\/p><figure class=\"bp-figure\" id=\"figure-wp-05\"><a href=\"https:\/\/blueportance.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/A2-adaptability-potential-ENUS.png\"><img decoding=\"async\" alt=\"Adaptability potential: the space of responses still accessible\" loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/blueportance.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/A2-adaptability-potential-ENUS.png\" style=\"width:100%;height:auto\"\/><\/a><figcaption>Illustration 4 \u2014 Adaptability potential: the space of responses still accessible. [SBNFA PROPOSITION] Adaptability potential represents the response possibilities still accessible; the landscape is a conceptual representation, without measured axes. <a href=\"https:\/\/blueportance.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/A2-adaptability-potential-ENUS.png\">Open in full resolution<\/a><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<div class=\"bp-table-wrap\"><table>\n<thead>\n<tr><th>Term<\/th><th>Definition in this dossier<\/th><th>Status<\/th><\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr><td><strong>Adaptability<\/strong><\/td><td>The subject\u2019s capacity to change their postural organization according to their state, the task, pain, duration, and the constraints encountered. It is expressed in context, in a postural form and a tissue form (see below).<\/td><td>Descriptive concept<\/td><\/tr>\n<tr><td><strong>Adaptability potential<\/strong><\/td><td>The full set of adaptation possibilities actually accessible to the subject in a given situation, given what the seat allows or constrains: postural organization, balance, and variation of the stresses applied to tissues.<\/td><td><strong>[SBNFA PROPOSITION]<\/strong> Central concept of the SBNFA framework; operationalized primarily by variables ADP-1 and ADP-2<\/td><\/tr>\n<tr><td><strong>Postural adaptive reserve<\/strong><\/td><td>The functional margin remaining before compensations are exhausted.<\/td><td><strong>[SBNFA PROPOSITION]<\/strong> Concept of the SBNFA framework<\/td><\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table><\/div>\n<p>Adaptability potential is therefore what the seat <em>makes possible<\/em> or what it <em>reduces<\/em>. It is not the same as comfort, nor as the subject\u2019s actual use: a capacity offered is not discounted because the subject does not use it. Function 1 of the framework evaluates it through two variables: ADP-1, which examines control of change (does the seat follow the subject without blocking, steering, or substituting for them?), and ADP-2, which examines the mechanical resolution of the interface (does it respond to very low-amplitude adaptations, with no threshold, dead zone, detent, or dominant return force?).<\/p>\n<div class=\"bp-example\">\n<p>Two people use two seats. The first is fitted with a mechanism that systematically returns it to a central point: the person moves, but follows the seat\u2019s trajectory. The second can change postural organization in several directions, stop wherever they wish, and move again. The observed movement may be comparable; the adaptability potential offered is not.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<h3>Postural adaptability, tissue adaptability, and the sensory loop<\/h3>\n<p>In the framework, <strong>adaptability<\/strong> is the integrating concept: the body\u2019s capacity to adjust its postural organization and tissue responses to constraints while preserving balance, mobility, and load distribution. It has two expressions to be distinguished: <strong>postural adaptability<\/strong>, the adjustment of the body\u2019s organization, and <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/blueportance.com\/en\/2026\/05\/19\/tissue-adaptability-back-pain\/\">tissue adaptability<\/a><\/strong>, the response of tissues to mechanical loading. Immediate postural adjustment and longer-term tissue adaptation must not be confused.<\/p>\n<p>A sensory, informational, and proprioceptive loop takes part in the process that enables adaptation: body movement, mechanical information transmitted to the seat, the seat\u2019s response, sensory feedback to the body, sensorimotor adjustment. The seat does not produce proprioception: it processes the mechanical information the body gives it, micromovements included, and may respond to it without delay \u2014 or not. This dimension is therefore not a third adaptability: it is a cross-cutting mechanism of adjustment. Function 6 is its most direct expression, and the fourth principle, autonomous regulation, is its foundation: the body constantly adjusts its posture based on sensory feedback.<\/p>\n<figure class=\"bp-figure\" id=\"figure-wp-06\"><a href=\"https:\/\/blueportance.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/A4-sensory-loop-ENUS.png\"><img decoding=\"async\" alt=\"From living systems to seating: two expressions of adaptability linked by a sensory loop\" loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/blueportance.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/A4-sensory-loop-ENUS.png\" style=\"width:100%;height:auto\"\/><\/a><figcaption>Illustration 5 \u2014 From living systems to seating: two expressions of adaptability linked by a sensory loop. [SBNFA PROPOSITION] Postural adaptability and tissue adaptability: two expressions linked by a cross-cutting sensory and proprioceptive loop. <a href=\"https:\/\/blueportance.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/A4-sensory-loop-ENUS.png\">Open in full resolution<\/a><\/figcaption><\/figure><h3>Three cross-cutting dimensions of interpretation<\/h3>\n<p>Three cross-cutting dimensions of interpretation make it possible to read the seven functions without replacing or redistributing them: the postural or biomechanical dimension (organization of the body, degrees of freedom, accessible balance states), the sensory, informational, and proprioceptive dimension, and the tissue dimension (stresses, variation and redistribution, tissue responses). A function may draw on several: Function 1 spans them all, since adaptability potential concerns postural organization, balance, and the variation of stresses applied to tissues alike.<\/p>\n<div class=\"bp-table-wrap\"><table>\n<thead>\n<tr><th>Level<\/th><th>Question<\/th><th>Content<\/th><\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr><td><strong>Integrating concept<\/strong><\/td><td>What are we seeking to preserve?<\/td><td>Adaptability: the capacity to keep adjusting to constraints<\/td><\/tr>\n<tr><td><strong>Two expressions<\/strong><\/td><td>What adapts?<\/td><td>Postural organization (postural adaptability); load-bearing tissues (tissue adaptability)<\/td><\/tr>\n<tr><td><strong>Three dimensions of interpretation<\/strong><\/td><td>Through which functional processes?<\/td><td>Postural or biomechanical; sensory, informational, and proprioceptive; tissue<\/td><\/tr>\n<tr><td><strong>Operational structure<\/strong><\/td><td>How is it observed and rated?<\/td><td>Seven functions, nineteen state variables, scale from 0 to 4 or ND \u2014 unchanged<\/td><\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table><\/div>\n<p><strong>[SBNFA PROPOSITION]<\/strong> These levels of interpretation add, remove, or redistribute no function or variable, and are not rated: they serve as an explanatory guide to the framework.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/blueportance.com\/en\/knowledge-base\/expert-guides\/living-flows\/adaptability-potential-sitting\/dynamic-chair-benchmark\/\">Chapter 4 (benchmark of six dynamic seats)<\/a> applies this notion to a specific seating architecture, the ExoBase Aporia\u00ae, and indicates what this architecture makes possible, along with its limits. How these capacities condition one another is described in <a href=\"https:\/\/blueportance.com\/en\/knowledge-base\/expert-guides\/living-flows\/adaptability-potential-sitting\/functional-evaluation-grid\/#section-9\">Chapter 3 (structural analysis of the nineteen variables)<\/a> and interpreted in <a href=\"https:\/\/blueportance.com\/en\/knowledge-base\/expert-guides\/living-flows\/adaptability-potential-sitting\/dynamic-chair-benchmark\/#section-7\">Chapter 4 (systemic reading of the benchmark)<\/a>. The link between tissue adaptability and low back pain is discussed more broadly in the article <a href=\"https:\/\/blueportance.com\/en\/2026\/05\/19\/tissue-adaptability-back-pain\/\">Tissue Adaptability and Back Pain<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n<section class=\"bp-section\" id=\"section-7\">\n<h2>7. From principles to functions<\/h2>\n<p class=\"bp-lead\">Each of the framework\u2019s seven functions is tied to the principle of which it is the main operational translation. It may contribute to other principles, but it is described and evaluated only once, to avoid any double counting.<\/p>\n<div class=\"bp-table-wrap\"><table>\n<thead>\n<tr><th>Foundational principle<\/th><th>Associated function(s)<\/th><th>Grid variables<\/th><\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr><td><strong>Motor variability<\/strong><\/td><td>1. Preservation of Adaptability Potential; 2. Management of Compensations<\/td><td>ADP-1, ADP-2; COM-1, COM-2<\/td><\/tr>\n<tr><td><strong>Tissue flows<\/strong><\/td><td>5. Management and Variability of Mechanical Stresses<\/td><td>CON-1, CON-2<\/td><\/tr>\n<tr><td><strong>Segmental independence<\/strong><\/td><td>3. Pelvic Mobility<\/td><td>MOB-1, MOB-2, MOB-3<\/td><\/tr>\n<tr><td><strong>Autonomous regulation<\/strong><\/td><td>4. Regulation of Postural Balance; 6. Processing and Feedback of Mechanical Information<\/td><td>EQU-1, EQU-2, EQU-3; INF-1, INF-2, INF-3<\/td><\/tr>\n<tr><td><strong>Prolonged external compression (specific category)<\/strong><\/td><td>7. Tissue Preservation<\/td><td>PRE-1, PRE-2, PRE-3, PRE-4<\/td><\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table><\/div>\n<p>The seventh function does not derive from any of the four principles: it addresses the constraint specific to seating, which imposes sustained external compression. It is built exclusively from what the seat offers; biological phenomena \u2014 mechanotransduction, creep, reperfusion, ischemia, gliding between tissue planes \u2014 are its expected effects or explanatory mechanisms, and do not become additional variables [<a href=\"#ref-1\">1<\/a>].<\/p>\n<\/section>\n<section class=\"bp-section\" id=\"section-8\">\n<h2>8. What the literature establishes, what the framework draws from it<\/h2>\n<p class=\"bp-lead\">This table summarizes, for each principle, what the literature establishes and what the framework draws from it for seating.<\/p>\n<div class=\"bp-table-wrap\"><table>\n<thead>\n<tr><th>Principle<\/th><th>Documented basis<\/th><th>What the literature establishes<\/th><th>What the framework draws from it for seating<\/th><\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr><td><strong>Motor variability<\/strong><\/td><td>Bernstein; Stergiou; Pynt<\/td><td><strong>[ESTABLISHED]<\/strong> Human movement is coordinated through the management of degrees of freedom; variability is studied as a characteristic of healthy systems<\/td><td><strong>[SBNFA PROPOSITION]<\/strong> Requirements for degrees of freedom, micromovements, and subject-led control (Functions 1 and 2)<\/td><\/tr>\n<tr><td><strong>Tissue flows<\/strong><\/td><td>Landis; Occhipinti; Langevin 2011; Lengsfeld<\/td><td><strong>[ESTABLISHED]<\/strong> Compression, perfusion, and tissue gliding are relevant parameters<\/td><td><strong>[SBNFA PROPOSITION]<\/strong> Requirements for pressure distribution and variation (Function 5) and for tissue preservation under load (Function 7); no ischemia threshold is derived<\/td><\/tr>\n<tr><td><strong>Segmental independence<\/strong><\/td><td>Hasegawa &amp; Dubousset; Barrey; Vleeming<\/td><td><strong>[ESTABLISHED]<\/strong> The pelvis is a central relay of the compensation chain; the sacroiliac joint plays a functional role in load transfer<\/td><td><strong>[SBNFA PROPOSITION]<\/strong> Requirements for pelvic mobility in all three planes (Function 3) and for spine\u2013pelvis pivoting (COM-2); pelvic incidence cannot be modified by the seat<\/td><\/tr>\n<tr><td><strong>Autonomous regulation<\/strong><\/td><td>Peterka; Mergner; Boonstra; Horak; Hasegawa &amp; Dubousset<\/td><td><strong>[ESTABLISHED]<\/strong> Postural control integrates multiple sensory sources and hip\u2013ankle chains<\/td><td><strong>[SBNFA PROPOSITION]<\/strong> Requirements for left\/right independence, a latitude perimeter, and an adjustable zero point (Functions 4 and 6); cone of economy transposed functionally<\/td><\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table><\/div>\n<div class=\"bp-key-message\">\n<p><strong>[SBNFA PROPOSITION]<\/strong> The principles organize documented phenomena into requirements for seating. <strong>[OUTLOOK]<\/strong> Instrumented measurements will make it possible to refine this transposition.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<section class=\"bp-faq\" id=\"faq\">\n<h2>Frequently asked questions<\/h2>\n<details>\n<summary>Why is sitting still for long periods a problem?<\/summary>\n<div class=\"faq-content\"><p>Because the living body works through continuous adjustments. When you sit still, the same support zones stay compressed, micro-adjustments become rare and the alternation between tissue compression and decompression disappears. Seating that lets the pelvis move and the support points vary restores part of this variability, without imposing movement.<\/p><\/div>\n<\/details>\n<details>\n<summary>Is squatting or sitting cross-legged more natural?<\/summary>\n<div class=\"faq-content\"><p>These natural positions retain more capacity for adjustment: the Hadza of Tanzania spend a notable share of their rest squatting, with higher muscle activity than on a chair (Raichlen et al., PNAS, 2020). The framework does not conclude that seating should reproduce them, but that it should preserve their properties: variability, segmental independence and active regulation.<\/p><\/div>\n<\/details>\n<details>\n<summary>Why speak of \u201cfoundational principles\u201d?<\/summary>\n<div class=\"faq-content\"><p>It is the SBNFA\u2122 framework\u2019s term for four organizing principles observed in natural positions: motor variability, tissue flows, segmental independence, autonomous regulation. They are foundational principles that explain why each function is evaluated; they are not themselves rated.<\/p><\/div>\n<\/details>\n<details>\n<summary>Do natural positions prove that a seat should be modeled on them?<\/summary>\n<div class=\"faq-content\"><p>No. The framework holds that an analogy with natural positions is not proof: it identifies functions to be investigated, each of whose mechanisms and expected effects must be documented according to its own level of evidence.<\/p><\/div>\n<\/details>\n<details>\n<summary>What are postural adaptability, tissue adaptability, and the sensory loop?<\/summary>\n<div class=\"faq-content\"><p>Adaptability is the integrating concept: the body\u2019s capacity to adjust its postural organization and tissue responses to constraints. Postural adaptability concerns the organization of the body; tissue adaptability, the response of load-bearing tissues. The sensory and proprioceptive loop is not a third adaptability: it is the mechanism through which mechanical information enables adjustment. The seat does not produce proprioception; it processes the information the body gives it.<\/p><\/div>\n<\/details>\n<details>\n<summary>What is adaptability potential in the seated position?<\/summary>\n<div class=\"faq-content\"><p>It is the full set of postural adaptation possibilities actually accessible to the subject in a given situation, given what the seat allows or constrains. It is the central concept of the SBNFA framework, operationalized by the variables of Function 1.<\/p><\/div>\n<\/details>\n<details>\n<summary>Can a seat improve proprioception?<\/summary>\n<div class=\"faq-content\"><p>The framework does not frame it that way. Proprioception is not produced by the seat: the seat processes the mechanical information the body gives it, by blocking it, absorbing it, or responding to it locally. The grid evaluates this fidelity of processing, not an effect on proprioception.<\/p><\/div>\n<\/details>\n<details>\n<summary>Is the 90\u00b0 pelvis\u2013femur relationship a norm?<\/summary>\n<div class=\"faq-content\"><p>No. It is not adopted as an established norm: it is a functional hypothesis to be individualized according to pelvic incidence, a morphological parameter that seating does not modify.<\/p><\/div>\n<\/details>\n<\/section>\n<section class=\"bp-sources\" id=\"references\">\n<h2>References<\/h2><p>The contribution and scope of each source are detailed in <a href=\"https:\/\/blueportance.com\/en\/knowledge-base\/expert-guides\/living-flows\/adaptability-potential-sitting\/glossary-bibliography\/#section-3\">Chapter 6 (annotated bibliography)<\/a>. A reference associated with a variable documents a phenomenon; it does not validate the variable.<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li id=\"ref-1\"><strong>Blue Portance, 2026 (a)<\/strong> \u2014 SBNFA\u2122 Framework for Evaluating Seating Devices \u2014 Part I: Scientific and Methodological Framework. Internal document, version of August 3, 2026.<\/li>\n<li id=\"ref-2\"><strong>Raichlen et al., 2020<\/strong> \u2014 <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1073\/pnas.1911868117\">Sitting, squatting, and the evolutionary biology of human inactivity<\/a>. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(13), 7115\u20137121.<\/li>\n<li id=\"ref-3\"><strong>Bernstein, 1967<\/strong> \u2014 The co-ordination and regulation of movements. Pergamon Press.<\/li>\n<li id=\"ref-4\"><strong>Stergiou et al., 2006<\/strong> \u2014 <a href=\"https:\/\/pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/17029655\/\">Optimal movement variability: a new theoretical perspective for neurologic physical therapy<\/a>. Journal of Neurologic Physical Therapy, 30(3), 120\u2013129.<\/li>\n<li id=\"ref-5\"><strong>Stergiou &amp; Decker, 2011<\/strong> \u2014 <a href=\"https:\/\/pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/21802756\/\">Human movement variability, nonlinear dynamics, and pathology: is there a connection?<\/a>. Human Movement Science, 30(5), 869\u2013888.<\/li>\n<li id=\"ref-6\"><strong>Pynt, 2015<\/strong> \u2014 <a href=\"https:\/\/pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/25892386\/\">Rethinking design parameters in the search for optimal dynamic seating<\/a>. Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies, 19(2), 291\u2013303.<\/li>\n<li id=\"ref-7\"><strong>Occhipinti et al., 1993<\/strong> \u2014 <a href=\"https:\/\/pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/8255258\/\">Criteria for the ergonomic evaluation of work chairs<\/a>. La Medicina del Lavoro, 84(4), 274\u2013285.<\/li>\n<li id=\"ref-8\"><strong>Landis, 1930<\/strong> \u2014 Micro-injection studies of capillary blood pressure in human skin. Heart, 15, 209\u2013228.<\/li>\n<li id=\"ref-9\"><strong>Lengsfeld et al., 2000<\/strong> \u2014 <a href=\"https:\/\/pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/10675672\/\">Spinal load changes during rotatory dynamic sitting<\/a>. Clinical Biomechanics.<\/li>\n<li id=\"ref-10\"><strong>Langevin et al., 2011<\/strong> \u2014 <a href=\"https:\/\/pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/21929806\/\">Reduced thoracolumbar fascia shear strain in human chronic low back pain<\/a>. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 12, 203.<\/li>\n<li id=\"ref-11\"><strong>Hasegawa &amp; Dubousset, 2022<\/strong> \u2014 <a href=\"https:\/\/pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/articles\/PMC9381078\/\">Cone of economy with the chain of balance: historical perspective and proof of concept<\/a>. Spine Surgery and Related Research, 6(4), 337\u2013349.<\/li>\n<li id=\"ref-12\"><strong>Barrey et al., 2013<\/strong> \u2014 <a href=\"https:\/\/pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/24052406\/\">Compensatory mechanisms contributing to keep the sagittal balance of the spine<\/a>. European Spine Journal, 22(Suppl. 6), S834\u2013S841.<\/li>\n<li id=\"ref-13\"><strong>Vleeming et al., 2012<\/strong> \u2014 <a href=\"https:\/\/pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/22994881\/\">The sacroiliac joint: an overview of its anatomy, function and potential clinical implications<\/a>. Journal of Anatomy, 221(6), 537\u2013567.<\/li>\n<li id=\"ref-14\"><strong>Peterka, 2002<\/strong> \u2014 <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1152\/jn.2002.88.3.1097\">Sensorimotor integration in human postural control<\/a>. Journal of Neurophysiology, 88(3), 1097\u20131118.<\/li>\n<li id=\"ref-15\"><strong>Mergner, Maurer &amp; Peterka, 2002<\/strong> \u2014 <a href=\"https:\/\/pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/12171105\/\">Sensory contributions to the control of stance: a posture control model<\/a>. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, 508, 147\u2013152.<\/li>\n<li id=\"ref-16\"><strong>Boonstra, Schouten &amp; van der Kooij, 2013<\/strong> \u2014 <a href=\"https:\/\/pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/23433148\/\">Identification of the contribution of the ankle and hip joints to multi-segmental balance control<\/a>. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 10, 23.<\/li>\n<li id=\"ref-17\"><strong>Horak, 2006<\/strong> \u2014 <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/ageing\/afl077\">Postural orientation and equilibrium: what do we need to know about neural control of balance to prevent falls?<\/a>. Age and Ageing, 35(Suppl. 2), ii7\u2013ii11.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<\/section>\n<\/article>\n<nav aria-label=\"Continue reading the dossier\" class=\"bp-pagination\"><a href=\"https:\/\/blueportance.com\/en\/knowledge-base\/expert-guides\/living-flows\/adaptability-potential-sitting\/living-system\/\">\u2190 From Fixed Mechanism to Living System<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/blueportance.com\/en\/knowledge-base\/expert-guides\/living-flows\/adaptability-potential-sitting\/functional-evaluation-grid\/\">Seven Functions, Nineteen Variables \u2192<\/a><\/nav><footer><p>SBNFA\u2122 Dossier \u00b7 Version 1.1 \u00b7 October 5, 2026 \u00b7 \u00a9 Blue Portance.<\/p><\/footer>\n\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Pillar1 \u00b7 From Fixed Mechanism to Living System2 \u00b7 Four Foundational Principles3 \u00b7 Seven Functions, Nineteen Variables4 \u00b7 Product Benchmark: A Dated Application of the Framework5 \u00b7 From Expert Evaluation to Instrumented Measurement6 \u00b7 Appendices, Glossary, and Bibliography SBNFA\u2122 Dossier \u00b7 Version 1.1 of October 5, 2026Gil Ayache, PhD \u2014 Mines Paris \u2013 PSL \u00b7 [&#8230;]\n","protected":false},"author":6,"featured_media":0,"parent":8233,"menu_order":2,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_yoast_wpseo_title":"Sitting Posture: 4 Biomechanical Principles | SBNFA\u2122 | Blue Portance","_yoast_wpseo_metadesc":"Motor variability, tissue flows, segmental independence and balance regulation: 4 principles for evaluating seating.","footnotes":""},"pathologie_secondaire":[],"effet_positif":[],"class_list":["post-8240","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v28.7 (Yoast SEO v28.7) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Sitting Posture: 4 Biomechanical Principles | SBNFA\u2122 | Blue Portance<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Motor variability, tissue flows, segmental independence and balance regulation: 4 principles for evaluating seating.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/blueportance.com\/en\/knowledge-base\/expert-guides\/living-flows\/adaptability-potential-sitting\/foundational-principles\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sitting Posture: 4 Biomechanical Principles | SBNFA\u2122 \u2013 Blue Portance\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Motor variability, tissue flows, segmental independence and balance regulation: 4 principles for evaluating seating.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/blueportance.com\/en\/knowledge-base\/expert-guides\/living-flows\/adaptability-potential-sitting\/foundational-principles\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Blue Portance\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/people\/Blue-Portance\/100095243965964\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-10-25T21:44:11+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/blueportance.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/03-natural-positions-ENUS.png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Sitting Posture: 4 Biomechanical Principles | SBNFA\u2122 \u2013 Blue Portance\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:description\" content=\"Motor variability, tissue flows, segmental independence and balance regulation: 4 principles for evaluating seating.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"18 minutes\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sitting Posture: 4 Biomechanical Principles | SBNFA\u2122 | Blue Portance","description":"Motor variability, tissue flows, segmental independence and balance regulation: 4 principles for evaluating seating.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/blueportance.com\/en\/knowledge-base\/expert-guides\/living-flows\/adaptability-potential-sitting\/foundational-principles\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sitting Posture: 4 Biomechanical Principles | SBNFA\u2122 \u2013 Blue Portance","og_description":"Motor variability, tissue flows, segmental independence and balance regulation: 4 principles for evaluating seating.","og_url":"https:\/\/blueportance.com\/en\/knowledge-base\/expert-guides\/living-flows\/adaptability-potential-sitting\/foundational-principles\/","og_site_name":"Blue Portance","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/people\/Blue-Portance\/100095243965964\/","article_modified_time":"2026-10-25T21:44:11+00:00","og_image":[{"url":"https:\/\/blueportance.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/03-natural-positions-ENUS.png","type":"","width":"","height":""}],"twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Sitting Posture: 4 Biomechanical Principles | SBNFA\u2122 \u2013 Blue Portance","twitter_description":"Motor variability, tissue flows, segmental independence and balance regulation: 4 principles for evaluating seating.","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"18 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/blueportance.com\/en\/knowledge-base\/expert-guides\/living-flows\/adaptability-potential-sitting\/foundational-principles\/","url":"https:\/\/blueportance.com\/en\/knowledge-base\/expert-guides\/living-flows\/adaptability-potential-sitting\/foundational-principles\/","name":"Sitting Posture: 4 Biomechanical Principles | SBNFA\u2122 | Blue Portance","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/blueportance.com\/en\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/blueportance.com\/en\/knowledge-base\/expert-guides\/living-flows\/adaptability-potential-sitting\/foundational-principles\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/blueportance.com\/en\/knowledge-base\/expert-guides\/living-flows\/adaptability-potential-sitting\/foundational-principles\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/blueportance.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/03-natural-positions-ENUS.png","datePublished":"2026-10-14T18:35:44+00:00","dateModified":"2026-10-25T21:44:11+00:00","description":"Motor variability, tissue flows, segmental independence and balance regulation: 4 principles for evaluating seating.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/blueportance.com\/en\/knowledge-base\/expert-guides\/living-flows\/adaptability-potential-sitting\/foundational-principles\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/blueportance.com\/en\/knowledge-base\/expert-guides\/living-flows\/adaptability-potential-sitting\/foundational-principles\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/blueportance.com\/en\/knowledge-base\/expert-guides\/living-flows\/adaptability-potential-sitting\/foundational-principles\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/blueportance.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/03-natural-positions-ENUS.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/blueportance.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/03-natural-positions-ENUS.png"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/blueportance.com\/en\/knowledge-base\/expert-guides\/living-flows\/adaptability-potential-sitting\/foundational-principles\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Accueil","item":"https:\/\/blueportance.com\/en\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"KB_HUB Knowledge Base","item":"https:\/\/blueportance.com\/en\/centre-de-connaissances\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"KB 3_Expert Guides_00_Child Hub Page","item":"https:\/\/blueportance.com\/en\/centre-de-connaissances\/dossiers-experts\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":4,"name":"KB 3_Expert Guide_02_Living Flows_00_Sub Hub","item":"https:\/\/blueportance.com\/en\/centre-de-connaissances\/dossiers-experts\/flux-du-vivant\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":5,"name":"KB 3_Expert Guide_02_Living Flows_03_Adaptability Potential_00_Pillar Page","item":"https:\/\/blueportance.com\/en\/centre-de-connaissances\/dossiers-experts\/flux-du-vivant\/potentiel-adaptabilite-position-assise\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":6,"name":"KB 3_Expert Guide_02_Living Flows_03_Adaptability Potential_02_Four Foundational Principles"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/blueportance.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/blueportance.com\/en\/","name":"Blue Portance","description":"Assises ergonomiques pour une posture saine et dynamique","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/blueportance.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/blueportance.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/blueportance.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Blue Portance","url":"https:\/\/blueportance.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/blueportance.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/blueportance.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/Logo-Blue-Portance.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/blueportance.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/Logo-Blue-Portance.webp","width":246,"height":50,"caption":"Blue Portance"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/blueportance.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/people\/Blue-Portance\/100095243965964\/"]}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blueportance.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/8240","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blueportance.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blueportance.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blueportance.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/6"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blueportance.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8240"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/blueportance.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/8240\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":8619,"href":"https:\/\/blueportance.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/8240\/revisions\/8619"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blueportance.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/8233"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blueportance.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8240"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"pathologie_secondaire","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blueportance.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pathologie_secondaire?post=8240"},{"taxonomy":"effet_positif","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blueportance.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/effet_positif?post=8240"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}